We make it absolutely clear that nobody can force Al-Markazus Salafi (In-Shaa-Allaah) to hate or love people based on speculation, exaggeration, personality clashes, lies or blameworthy competition. We are not friends or foes to anyone based on desires. May Allaah protect you all. Aameen.

Mus’ab Ibn Sad (rahimahullaah) reports that the affair of the khawaarij was mentioned in the presence of his father, so he (i.e. his father) said: They are a deviated people, so Allaah deviated their hearts.’’ [Source: ‘As-Sunnah’ of Abdullah Ibn (Imaam) Ahmad 2/638]

Ibnul Jawzee (rahimahullaah) said:

It is incumbent upon a sensible person that he makes preparations for his departure (from this world), for indeed he neither knows when the command of his Lord will descend nor when he will be called back. Indeed, I see many people deceived by youthfulness, forgetful of the loss of companions and infatuated with prolonged expectations.

And it may be that a scholar who is solely interested in himself would say: ‘’I will seek knowledge today and act upon it tomorrow.’’ So he becomes lackadaisical with regards to committing mistakes due to comfort and is withheld by the hope that he will accomplish repentance. He neither keeps away from backbiting nor keeps away from listening to it. And he forgets that death will descend unexpectedly.

Therefore, the sensible person gives every moment its due right with regards to what is obligated on him, so that when death suddenly arrives he is considered prepared. And if the (things) hoped for are received, then this is increased goodness. [Abridged: Source: Saydul Khaatir: page18]

Abu Mu’aawiyah (Abdullaah al-Gambi)

Imaam Ibn Katheer (rahimahullaah) said:

Al-Hasan Ibn Saafee Ibn Bazdan At-Turki was from the senior rulers of Baghdad, who ruled in the Islamic. But he was a Raafidi, a wicked one and bigoted supporter of the Rawaafid. They [i.e. the Rawaafid] and honoured by him until Allaah relieved the Muslims of him in that year [i.e. the year 568AH] in the month of Dhul Hijjah. He was buried in his house, but moved to Quraish’s graveyard thereafter. All praise and bounty belongs to Allaah. When he died, Ahlus Sunnah were very happy and they openly thanked Allaah. You did not find any of them except that he praised Allaah. [Al-Bidaayatu Wan-Nihaayatu 12/338]

See here: All you need to know about the Rawaafid: http://www.shia.bs/index.cfm

Al-Khallaal (rahimahullaah) said: It was said to Abu Abdillaah [i.e. Imaam Ahmad (rahimahullaah)]: Has a man sinned for rejoicing due to what afflicts the companions of Ibn Abee Du’aad? He said, ‘’Who would not rejoice with this?’’ [As-Sunnah 5/121]

Who was Ibn Abee Du’aad?

Ibn Abee Du’aad and Bishr al-Mireesee: These are the two that encouraged the ruler, Al-Ma’moon, to inflict punishment upon Imaam Ahmad (rahimahullaah) and upon others from the Scholars so as to extract from them the saying that the Qur’aan is created. [For further details see link: http://www.abukhadeejah.com/imaam-barbahaaree-on-whoever-a-praises-an-innovator-allaamah-fawzaan-explains/

Salamah Bin Shubaib (rahimahullaah) said, ‘’I was once with Abdur-Razzaaq As-San’aanee (rahimahullaah), then (news) of the death of Abdul Majeed reached us; so he said, ‘’All praise is due to Allaah, who relieved the Ummah of Muhammad [sallal-laahu-alayhi-sallam] of Abdul Majeed Ibn Abdil Azeez . [siyar a’laam an-nubulaa 9/435]

This Abdul Majeed Ibn Abdil Azeez Ibn Abee Ruwaad was a figurehead of Ir’jaa.

———————————————————————–

What is Irjaa? See following articles at www.salafipublications.com

The Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-wasallam) said:

فإنه من يعش منكم فسيرى اختلافا، فعليكم بسنتي

‘’Indeed the one who lives long amongst you will see differences; so upon you is to (adhere) to my Sunnah.’’

Imaam Abu Haatim (rahimahullaah) said: This is clear evidence that the Messenger (sallal-laahu-alayhi-sallam) commanded his Ummah to know the Du’afaa amongst them and (distinguish) them from the Thiqaat. That is because the Sunnah cannot be adhered to alongside the lies and falsehood mixed with it, except by way of knowing the Du’afaa and (distinguishing them) from the Thiqaat.

[Source: Muqaddimah Kitaab Al-Majrooheem Minal Muhadditheen of Imaam Ibn Hibbaan (rahimahullaah) Page: 66]

link:

http://www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=9&Topic=12297

In The Name of Allaah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy

In a speech of Muhammad Al-Maaliki at Brixton, he advised his listeners to refer to Ali Halabi and others regarding Brixton’s Affair! So if this view of his was uttered before Ali Al-Halabi innovated and deviated, then what is his stance regarding Ali Al-Halabi at present? That is because a man with fifty years of knowledge should not be oblivious of the stances of the Salafees against those who are well known for their bidah and misguidance, such as Ali Al-Halabi and others.

But if this statement (i.e. directing listeners to Ali Al-Halabi) of his was uttered after the verdict of the scholars against Ali Al-Halabi, then we do not expect any answer from Muhammad Al-Maaliki; rather he has already proven to be a reckless defender of the staunch UK followers of the innovators Al-Maribi and Al-Halabi. Sitting in the presence of a Hizbi Masjid Admin at Masjid As-Sunnah, Muhammad Al-Maaliki did announce his willingness to slander, peppering a 27min defense with their acknowledgement and a call to sabotage most of what the Salafiyyoon established by way of sound manhaj stances against the staunch UK followers of Al-Maribi at Masjid As-Sunnah since 2003.

So instead of adopting the sound manhaj positions, Muhammad Al-Maaliki, to this day, is one who stands un apologetically with the followers of Al-Maribi and Al-Halabi at Masjid As-Sunnah and Brixton.

See here about Ali Al-Halabi

http://www.manhaj.com/manhaj/categories/kp-the-false-principles-of-ali-hasan-al-halabi.cfm